SA treads Iran oil embargo tightrope

Comment on this story


BR Hormuz 79088

Reuters

The American aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln transits the Indian Ocean. The ship sailed through the Strait of Hormuz and into the Persian Gulf without incident on Sunday, a day after Iran backed away from a threat to take action if a US carrier returned to the strategic oil route. Photo: Reuters

South Africa is assessing the impact of following the US and EU’s lead in imposing a ban on new contracts for crude oil and petroleum products from Iran, which would mean that South Africa’s oil refineries may have to carry out multimillion-rand reconfigurations if they are to wean themselves from an Iranian crude oil “diet”.

The Iran embargo saga is a political conundrum for South Africa, especially at a time when the country is serving as rotating chair of the UN Security Council.

Iran is South Africa’s principal supplier of crude oil and the ANC has long had close ties with the Iranian government. In the 1990s, the Mandela government offered to sell nuclear enrichment expertise to Iran, an issue of deep concern to the US, which believes Iran is poised to produce nuclear weapons.

South Africa has for years argued that embargoes against Iran should be dropped, believing its nuclear intentions were peaceful, but the country may have to review its stance given Iran’s sabre rattling in the Gulf in response to sanctions.

Nelisiwe Magubane, the director-general of the Department of Energy, said the government was still mulling its response to the imposition by the 27 EU foreign ministers of the embargo aimed at forcing Iran back to the negotiating table over the nuclear issue.

Magubane said her department would take direction ultimately from the Department of International Co-operation and Development (Dirco).

“We have done a quick assessment of the refineries that will be affected,” she noted, indicating this had been done by assuming that an embargo was placed by South Africa. The oil refineries are all run by private oil companies including Shell, BP, Sasol, Engen and Chevron. She confirmed that PetroSA, the state oil and gas company, did not import crude oil from Iran. “Modifications will cost anything up to R300 million to be able to reconfigure… to accept other crude oil diets”.

The department was investigating sourcing alternatives from other countries, including Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Ghana and Angola, she said.

SA Petroleum Industry Association executive director Avhapfani Tshifularo confirmed that Iran was the biggest supplier of crude oil, accounting for about 29 percent of requirements. Magubane confirmed that it amounted to about 100 000 barrels a day.

The next largest supplier, at some 24 percent of the country’s needs, was Saudi Arabia.

Tshifularo said that it was probably best suited to the refineries’ configuration as it was drawn from the same region.

A Dirco spokesman, Clayson Monyela, referred all queries on the Iran issue to the Department of Energy. Magubane said the Treasury, the Department of Energy and Dirco would forge a policy position in due course.

Economist Iraj Abedian, who is also a special adviser to Mineral Resources Minister Susan Shabangu, said the crisis might provide South Africa with the opportunity to bargain for discounted crude from Iran, if it were to take a principled position to put pressure on the regime in Iran. “As a new Security Council member we carry the additional responsibility to anticipate the potential consequences for the global market and global security.”

“These are early days,” Abedian noted, indicating that the government had not taken a decision on how to respond to the dilemma. It might choose, like China and India, to get cheaper oil “and score financially while the going is good or take a principled position. Each may be justified in one way or another”.

PetroSA spokesman Thabo Mabaso and Central Energy Fund spokesman Mandla Tyala – who spoke on behalf of the Strategic Fuel Fund Association – confirmed that the state-owned companies did not store Iranian oil.


sign up
 
 

Comment Guidelines



  1. Please read our comment guidelines.
  2. Login and register, if you haven’ t already.
  3. Write your comment in the block below and click (Post As)
  4. Has a comment offended you? Hover your mouse over the comment and wait until a small triangle appears on the right-hand side. Click triangle () and select "Flag as inappropriate". Our moderators will take action if need be.

     

baboona, wrote

IOL Comments
06:48am on 27 January 2012
IOL Comments

Iran is not a peaceful country: it is the main sponsor of international terrorism, it fought a terrible 8 year war with Iraq for nonsense reasons, and threatens to throw a nuclear bomb on Israel ... The regime is also very oppressive and lead by a handful of weirdos. Even if you are anti-American you should be very worried when Iran manages to make a nuclear bomb!

Report this

IOL Comments

rafik, wrote

IOL Comments
09:52pm on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

if we are serious about our history and our people,then we [south african's] must not support the wild west arrogant ,bully attitude towards the few nation's such as [iran-cuba-venezuela]that are trying to be independent of nato's gangsterism,or we too will look like lackey's.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
07:39pm on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

Well, maybe you & Salim have an elegant solution... ;-)

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
06:04pm on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

To all of those saying that we must not be dictated to- sure, fine in principal. Going against what these countries support and going against the UN which we co chair is a dangerous direction to take. How do you explain going against a resolution by an organisation you co-chair. The damage to trade agreements, prices and international relations make it unwise. Why would we want to support Iran? Their human rights record is shocking! I am shocked we buy anything from them. Why not buy Angolan and support Africa. Our government is forever crying about Africa being left out but we don't have them as a major supplier. As someone said earlier- let Iran buy their nuclear devices for energy like we do. If they are not prepared to then I guess their motives are probably not pure. Supporting the resolution would actually help our international standing, which is not looking to good at this point.

Report this

IOL Comments

^_^, wrote

IOL Comments
05:40pm on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

Hang on let me get this straight SA are friends and trade with an oppressivedangerous regime and don't support sanctions against it, hmmm so I guess the EU and US were also wrong to sanction Apartheid South Africa or is it impossible to be a hypocrite if you vote ANC?

Report this

IOL Comments

@ Gary, wrote

IOL Comments
04:43pm on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

This has nothing to do with religeon, but justice, and if you really want to see it in a religeos light, then you can do the counting yourself and add up how many people were killed by "Christian America" you can start with the vietnam war, korean war, hiroshima and Nagasaki etc.etc. and and how many innocent were killed "Christian Nato" then you compare the numbers by how many countries Iran invaded and the numbers killed by Iran. you will soon realise that your reasoning are drven by prejudice!!!

Report this

IOL Comments

waheed, wrote

IOL Comments
04:35pm on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

Nobody should tell SA who our friends or enemies are. The USA has no right to preach to us and tell us who we can and cant do business with. Iran is lead by a repressive regime, but this in no way legitimizes US and EU sanctions that ultimately only hurt innocent civilians. The USA has as much blood on its hands as does Iran. I'd say we continue to buy oil, but drive a hard bargain and get it at a good price.

Report this

IOL Comments

3J, wrote

IOL Comments
04:26pm on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

it’s high time that SA take the best decision without having to follow the US…I think all the countries that have resources like oil should have nuclear weapons just to protect their resources for the US … regardless of what the US and UN said because these guys are working together UN works for US and the UK…. Look at what they did to countries like Iraqi and Libya it was all about oil nothing else…

Report this

IOL Comments

LOL, wrote

IOL Comments
03:53pm on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

Ha! Seems like the pro zionist board of deputies are out in full force here. This is not 10yrs ago... people are now aware of the truth and wide awake!

Report this

IOL Comments

C Revo, wrote

IOL Comments
02:29pm on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

why should south africa or iran or any other country still be saying "yes baas" to these western powers who are trying to fill their empty pockets by selling the oil of iraq, libya, afghanistan. iran has a right to nuclear power and to develop it on its own. dont listen to the USA, they are still looking for WMD's in iraq.

Report this

IOL Comments

Wakeup Sheeple!, wrote

IOL Comments
01:52pm on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

Please! anyone who still supports the North Atlantic Terrorist Organisation invading another country deserves to stay dumb! You probably believe that a bunch of Al-Ciada cave dwellars flew planes into those buildings as well. Every country they've invaded either has oil or is situated in a strategic oil pipeline region. See the trend??? Oh.. one of the posters mentioned Sauid, Jordan etc etc supporting the US. Of course they do, its the very US that backs those dictatorships. Believe it or not Iran is the only democracy in the ME! Educate yourselves people!!

Report this

IOL Comments

bobjones, wrote

IOL Comments
01:36pm on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

Alex - you must check your facts. Iran and Iraq warred between September 1980 to August 1988, making it the longest conventional war of the 20th century regardless of who started it as they will blame each other as well as the kitchen sink or even apartheid. Or are you one of those bright sparks that go 30% for mathematics!

Report this

IOL Comments

Gadaffi, wrote

IOL Comments
01:33pm on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

FCK the embargo - if the US can have nuclear, why not anybody else - those awholes keep printing dollars and live in a false economy while everybody else suffers

Report this

IOL Comments

GROOT BAAS ABIE, wrote

IOL Comments
01:24pm on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

It is time for the SOUTH African government & ANC to prove to the EU and the US that SA is a free country, which is not run by puppets.Yesterday South Africa and the African Union were treated like nobodies by the UN on the Lybia[Gaddafi] issue.Let's wait and see if they are puppets.

Report this

IOL Comments

marty, wrote

IOL Comments
01:23pm on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

I can just see the headlines coming - 'Please switch off your cars because we have a problem!' displayed on our tv sets just after we are asked to switch off our toasters!

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
01:10pm on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

oh joy I like the uninformed comments regarding this article. apartheid boo hooo or Israel booo hooo JUST GROW UP THE WHOLE LOT OF YOU. go back to school - oh dear you won't get any decent schooling in this country. The Islamic threat must be countered on all fronts period.

Report this

IOL Comments

Gary, wrote

IOL Comments
12:09pm on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

Unbelievable that South Africans are siding with a country that executes women for dressing 'immodestly' and gays and which persecutes minorities savagely. and some of these people making these comments are probabely oddly feminists and gay rights activists. This for a country that is suppsoed to be steeped in a 'human rights' culture. And Iran has no right to build nuclear weapons in order to threaten genocide of other countries. Just shows what a scik society South Africa has become since the hopeful days of 1994. Judge countries and people by the company which they keep. These are the same sick people who will defend Mugabe and ZANU PF.

Report this

IOL Comments

Peter Funda, wrote

IOL Comments
11:52am on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

People seem quick to forget that that "west" is not stopping Iran from building nuclear power plants (like they state they want to), but rather objecting to having them be able to ENRICH uranium to a WEAPONS grade. There is no reason why Iran could not just buy the enriched fuel rods for their new power plants, just like WE DO (i.e Koeberg). I trust Iran's promise to only enrich to energy grade, as much as I trust a 18year old's (in a Porsche) promise to stay below 120KMh on the highway. @natheem, China does not care about Africa, it only want access to cheaper raw material to further its growth from selling finished products to the west.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anti US Bully, wrote

IOL Comments
11:47am on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

To anonymous claiming weapons of mass destruction to kill blacks u must have rocks in your head. However only the big 5 to have nuclear weapons by their own decision, but no problem to them if Israel has it. What about Pakistan & India. We should buy our oil wherever we can at best deal for South africa & not be dictated to by the US. An embargo will suit their saudi puppets & rest of world will have to carry the cost.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anti US Bully, wrote

IOL Comments
11:46am on 26 January 2012
IOL Comments

To anonymous claiming weapons of mass destruction to kill blacks u must have rocks in your head. However only the big 5 to have nuclear weapons by their own decision, but no problem to them if Israel has it. What about Pakistan & India. We should buy our oil wherever we can at best deal for South africa & not be dictated to by the US. An embargo will suit their saudi puppets & rest of world will have to carry the cost.

Report this

IOL Comments

Showing items 1 - 20 of 41

Join us on

IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks
Sudoku