SEC lawsuit against BoA should proceed - judge

Comment on this story
IOL pic mar27 bank of america atm Reuters Customers use Bank of America ATMs in Santa Monica, California. File picture: Lucy Nicholson

New York - A federal judge on Monday recommended letting the US Securities and Exchange Commission pursue a lawsuit against Bank of America over $855-million of mortgage securities that soured during the global financial crisis.

US Magistrate Judge David Cayer in Charlotte, North Carolina, where the bank is based, made the recommendation four days after urging dismissal of a related Department of Justice civil lawsuit, which alleged violations of a different law.

That ruling had been seen as a possible setback for government efforts to fight fraud by Wall Street in the sale of mortgage securities.

“We are reviewing the magistrate judge's recommendation carefully,” bank spokesman Lawrence Grayson said on Monday, with regard to the SEC civil case.

Both recommendations are subject to review by US District Judge Max Cogburn in Charlotte. District judges are not bound by magistrate judges' recommendations but often follow them.

Authorities accused Bank of America of misleading Wachovia, now part of Wells Fargo & Company, and the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco about risks in the $855-million offering, dating from early 2008 and backed by 1 191 “jumbo” adjustable rate mortgages that proved less safe than expected.

These loans had been made between July and November 2007, and had initial principal balances over $417 000, authorities said.

The Justice Department had sued under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989, which it has relied on in several recent financial crisis cases. Cayer said it failed to meet a requirement that any alleged false statements were “material” to a government regulator.

But the SEC sued under the Securities Act of 1933, a law traditionally used to fight fraud in securities sales. Cayer said that regulator could pursue claims that Bank of America “negligently made material misrepresentations and omissions”.

About 70 percent of the loans went through the “wholesale channel”, or third-party brokers, even though then-Bank of America Chief Executive Kenneth Lewis had in a July 2007 conference call referred to such loans as “toxic waste”.

But Cayer said Bank of America hid the risks by “directing” investors in disclosures to supposedly comparable offerings where just 42 percent of loans went in the wholesale channel.

“These allegations are sufficient to withstand dismissal,” Cayer wrote.

SEC spokesman John Nester declined to comment.

Since 2010, Bank of America has agreed to pay well over $50-billion to settle legal and other claims stemming from the nation's housing and financial crises.

The case is SEC v. Bank of America Corp et al, US District Court, Western District of North Carolina, No. 13-00447. - Reuters

sign up

Comment Guidelines

  1. Please read our comment guidelines.
  2. Login and register, if you haven’ t already.
  3. Write your comment in the block below and click (Post As)
  4. Has a comment offended you? Hover your mouse over the comment and wait until a small triangle appears on the right-hand side. Click triangle () and select "Flag as inappropriate". Our moderators will take action if need be.

  5. Verified email addresses: All users on Independent Media news sites are now required to have a verified email address before being allowed to comment on articles. You are only required to verify your email address once to have full access to commenting on articles. For more information please read our comment guidelines