#PovertyPorn or #SympathySleepout?

The Nelson Mandela bridge, where CEOs slept out, is seen in this file image.

The Nelson Mandela bridge, where CEOs slept out, is seen in this file image.

Published Jul 29, 2016

Share

Social media buzz about #CEOSleepout2016 - which saw South African CEOs sleep outside in the winter cold to raise funds for charity and create awareness about homelessness - shows that the road to brand reputation hell is often paved with good intentions.

Data extracted from the Salesforce Marketing Cloud Social Studio by online media agency, 25AM, shows that the event attracted twice as many negative social mentions as positive ones, as social media users criticised the CEOs and organisers for being insensitive, publicity-seeking and out-of-touch. The criticism has overshadowed the R31 million the CEOs have raised for charity through the event.

Read also:  CEO SleepOut is ‘ubuntu in action’

The event generated more than 22 000 mentions on Twitter on the day it was held (July 28), most of them associated with the official hashtag, #CEOSleepout2016. This marks a significant increase over the 4 200 or so conversations about the inaugural CEOSleepout in 2015, when negative comments were heavily outweighed by positive commentary.

Other trending hashtags for the Sleepout included #CEOSleepout, #4leaders4change, and #sympathysleepout. Users critical of the event posted using hashtags such as #sleepforland and #povertyporn. Negative keywords associated with the event on Twitter included “offensive”, “crude”, and “cruel”. Much of the positive commentary came from brands and organisers involved in the event.

Negative mentions started to spike at around 18h00 when protesting students and Economic Freedom Front (EFF) members took their protest about education costs to Nelson Mandela Bridge, where the CEOs were sleeping. This is testimony to the social media savvy of both South African students and the EFF - who have perhaps mastered social media in a way that few brands have.

Many people suspect that corporate social investment has more to do with seeking publicity than it does with doing good, and they are using social media to make this opinion known.

CEO's must just donate to the needy &spare us th spectacle of displaying their expensive windbreakers #CEOSleepout👎👎 pic.twitter.com/ciHL2kBcxu

— Mzwanele Manyi (@KrilaGP) July 29, 2016

Brands need to show a great deal of sensitivity in how they handle publicity and messaging for their charitable giving if they want to resonate with people. No brand likes to the subject of social media controversy, but there is a wonderful opportunity to analyse and learn from the conversation.

Andre Steenekamp is CEO of 25AM. His opinion does not necessarily reflect that of IOL.

IOL

Related Topics: