Size does matter for giants, the smaller the better

A logo stands above the Siemens AG gas turbine factory in Berlin, Germany on Monday, Sept. 30, 2013. Siemens AG's new Chief Executive Officer Joe Kaeser is widening job cuts from an initial plan after the failure to catch up in profitability with rivals General Electric Co. and ABB Ltd. cost his predecessor the job. Photographer: Krisztian Bocsi/Bloomberg

A logo stands above the Siemens AG gas turbine factory in Berlin, Germany on Monday, Sept. 30, 2013. Siemens AG's new Chief Executive Officer Joe Kaeser is widening job cuts from an initial plan after the failure to catch up in profitability with rivals General Electric Co. and ABB Ltd. cost his predecessor the job. Photographer: Krisztian Bocsi/Bloomberg

Published Nov 7, 2014

Share

EUROPE’S biggest conglomerates are slimming down, discarding units that either don’t make enough money or don’t fit with how they see the future. It makes sense to concentrate on fewer industries.

There’s no obvious synergy between building power stations and selling hearing aids, or between engineering more fertile seeds and making polycarbonate car parts. It just might herald the start of a second European industrial revolution.

It’s certainly set off a massive mergers-and-acquisitions wave.

Germany’s Siemens is leading the charge. It has discarded at least five businesses this year to focus on what it calls “electrification, automation and digitalisation”. And that is after more divestments last year than any European industrial company, according to Bloomberg Intelligence. Both Germany’s Bayer and Philips of the Netherlands are abandoning their century-old business roots in a burst of Schumpeterian creative destruction.

Siemens is allowing partner Robert Bosch to take over its appliance business by selling Bosch a 50 percent stake for e3 billion (R41.6bn).

Siemens is also selling a health data unit for $1.3bn (R14.4bn), a clinical microbiology division for an undisclosed sum, an alarms-and-video surveillance maker, and a hearing-aids business for e2.2bn.

On the acquisitions side, Siemens is muscling up in the markets on which it wants to focus. It paid $7.6bn for Dresser-Rand in September to bolster the oil field equipment division, and $1.3bn in May for a unit making gas turbines and compressors from Rolls-Royce.

It missed out on the energy assets of France’s Alstom, beaten by US giant General Electric’s $17bn bid. (GE is also slimming down by offloading a consumer appliance business to Sweden’s Electrolux for $3.3 billion earlier this year.)

In Amsterdam, Philips is melding its healthcare and consumer divisions into a HealthTech unit, selling products that will arm people with data about their own health, exercise and nutrition through personal technology.

The lighting business from which Philips sprang 123 years ago will become its own separate company, though the split units will have a “brother and sister” relationship, with the lighting products still featuring in its health-care equipment.

In another signal that corporate nostalgia is passe, Bayer plans to spin off its plastics business by mid-2016, abandoning an industry it has been in for more than 150 years and that contributes more than a third of sales.

As companies try to become less sprawling, workforces are also shrinking. Philips employed 117 000 people at the end of last year, down from more than 121 000 five years ago. Bayer shed more than 3 000 staff last year, while Siemens has 362 000 workers, a fifth fewer than in 2005.

Almost two decades after the breakup of Hanson, the British multinational that became one of the world’s biggest companies spanning cigarettes, mining, toys and brickmaking, maybe the unfocused, unwieldy conglomerate is finally dying.

While the short-term pain of job cuts add to the labour market misery in a euro area with 11.5 percent unemployment, it bodes well for the region’s industrial future.

Mark Gilbert is a Bloomberg columnist.

Related Topics: