An experiment in racial harmonyComment on this story
Washington - Beginning in 1953, almost 30 years after her first successful performances on the Paris stage, the singer and dancer Josephine Baker adopted 12 children from different countries, ranging from Finland to Venezuela. She installed what she called her “Rainbow Tribe” in a 15th century chateau in the South of France and charged admission to tourists who came to hear them sing, to tour their home, or to watch them play leapfrog in their garden.
This little-known chapter in Baker’s life is an uncomfortable one. “I would begin to tell the story of Josephine Baker, and people would start to laugh,” says Matthew Pratt Guterl, the author of a new book on Baker’s later life, Josephine Baker and the Rainbow Tribe. “And I would start to wonder what that laughter signified.”
Guterl, a professor of Africana studies and American studies at Brown University, has in essence written two books in one: the story of Baker’s family, and a meditation on the meaning of that laughter.
Baker was born in St Louis but moved to France in 1925. Her danse sauvage, famously performed in a banana skirt, brought her international fame. During World War II, she worked for the Red Cross and gathered intelligence for the French Resistance. After the war, married to her fourth husband, Jo Bouillon, she struggled to conceive a child. Meanwhile, her career waned.
Guterl’s book is about this period of Baker’s life, as she built her large adopted family, became ever more active on behalf of the nascent civil rights movement in the US, and re-emerged into fame.
Baker purchased her estate, known as Les Milandes, after marrying Bouillon in 1947. In addition to the chateau, the property boasted a motel, a bakery, cafés, a jazz club, a miniature golf course, and a wax museum telling the story of Baker’s life.It was over-the-top, but its ostentation was a political statement, announcing to the world that African American girls born poor could transcend nation and race and find wealth and happiness.
At the centre of the attractions were Baker’s adopted children, from Finland, Japan, France, Belgium, Venezuela. During their school-age years, the 10 boys and two girls grew up in public. Just by existing as a multiracial, multinational family, they demonstrated Baker’s belief in the possibility of equality. They sang songs for paying visitors, appeared in print adverts, gave interviews to a curious press, and played in a courtyard in full view of what Guterl describes as “a wall of faces, watching and taking pictures”.
You can see why this chapter of Baker’s story provokes laughter.
First, there’s a deep discomfort at her unapologetic marshalling of children to act out her own utopian racial narrative.
Second, we think we understand what’s going on here; we see early incarnations of celebrity eccentricities from our own time. In the big adoptive family, we see Angelina Jolie or Madonna; in the celebrity theme park, we see Michael Jackson’s Neverland Ranch.
“The language of the strange and famous is readily available to us,” Guterl writes in the book’s prologue.
“This same easy familiarity makes it harder to understand Les Milandes, not easier, because we rarely allow celebrity egocentrism to be serious or important.”
Guterl steps back, seeing the Tribe from Baker’s point of view. Baker was always an activist, wielding her international fame in the service of the civil rights movement in the US. When she visited the US in the 1950s, she demanded that she be allowed to stay at the best hotels and play to integrated audiences.
Another bit of context: The Rainbow Tribe wasn’t the first, or the only, project of its kind. As Guterl notes, large, public, transracial families were a Cold War phenomenon in the US. At a time when Americans worried about spreading communist influence in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, these “UN families”, featuring members from all continents, showed that “everyone, really, could be brought into the Western system”.
Guterl points to Helen and Carl Doss, a religious couple who adopted nine children, many of whom were from Asian countries; to novelist Pearl S Buck, who adopted seven children of different races and became a public advocate for interracial adoption; even to the infamous Jim Jones, who adopted an interracial group he named the Rainbow Family and who formed the core of his utopian cult.
Like these groups, Baker’s Rainbow Tribe was the product of careful planning for symbolic value. Children were renamed and raised in different religious traditions so they could be more typical of the racial and national types that Baker had decided should be represented in the Tribe.
Some kids received new backstories. Baker wanted an Israeli child, but the Israeli welfare minister refused. So Baker adopted a French orphan, named him Moïse (French for “Moses”), and decided that he would be raised Jewish. By dressing the children up in strong national, ethnic and religious identities, Baker could make a political point about the human capacity to get along despite differences.
In reading Baker’s correspondence, contemporary media coverage and other documentation, Guterl found it hard to discern the children’s individuality. He writes: “Their voices were significantly less important than their performance as an ensemble...”
The performance was difficult to sustain, however. The last few chapters of Guterl’s book, which tell the story of what happened to the Tribe as they grew older, are tinged with tragedy.
Baker struggled with health problems and her career couldn’t generate enough money to sustain the large family she had created. She moved the Rainbow Tribe to Monaco to live in a less grand home paid for by friend and patron, Princess Grace.
Here the kids, now entering their teenage years and, in some cases, chafing at their public lives, began to resist Baker’s authority. Baker looked for ways to farm the children out to others.
Bouillon, Baker’s husband at the time of the adoptions, was now her latest ex; some of the kids went to live with him. Others went to boarding schools. Baker sent a small group to live with a long-time Baker fan in Great Britain. In perhaps the saddest and most puzzling outcome, when Baker found out that Jarry (adopted from Finland) was gay, she chastised him in front of his siblings before sending him away to live with Bouillon in Buenos Aires.
But Guterl’s is not a book to read if you want to revel in the downfall of what seems like an ill-conceived experiment. The author, who told me that he grew up in a large, multiracial adopted family himself, resists offering up all of the gory details.
In Guterl’s book, and in other interviews they’ve given, the grown-up adoptees generally remember their childhoods at Les Milandes with fondness.
Interviewed by Der Spiegel in 2009, Jarry said, “She was too possessive. We weren’t allowed to develop the way we wanted to.” Akio (adopted from Japan) offered a more charitable assessment: “She was a great artist, and she was our mother. Mothers make mistakes. Nobody’s perfect.” – Slate/The Washington Post News Service