Driving in Mexico City is a nightmare, while in Montreal it's a relative breeze.
That’s the finding of an IBM-sponsored survey of 8000 drivers in 20 cities who were asked about their level of “commuter pain” and the consequences in terms of stress, lost time, and ill health.
IBM director of intelligent transportation systems, Vinodh Swaminathan, said: “Traffic congestion is down on a global level, while the pain of commuting is increasing.”
Swaminathan said economic weakness and high fuel prices were two reasons for the drop in traffic congestion since the survey was first conducted four years ago. Huge investments in roads and public transit infrastructure by emerging economic powers China and India also helped a bit.
Still, 41 percent of the drivers surveyed would like to kick their vehicles to the curb and take public transportation instead, if available, the survey found.
Mexico City - which had the highest driver pain index of 108, compared to Montreal's 21 - intends to spend more than $2 billion (R14 billion) in coming years to ease its colossal traffic problem.
But Swaminathan said: “You cannot build your way out of congestion. It has to be a balance of infrastructure improvements and technology.”
Stockholm, ranked fourth on the list of 20 cities, installed a congestion pricing system to reduce demand, cutting traffic by 25 percent and commuting times in half, he said.
In California, drivers can obtain information on predicted road congestion based on data from road sensors. Some cities use programmable traffic lights to speed flow.
There are clear benefits in reducing traffic jams, Swaminathan said, citing a study that concluded a 10 percent reduction in traffic congestion produced a two percent increase in local economic activity.
But even in cities viewed as less-trafficked, many auto-bound commuters were miserable, the study concluded.
In Moscow, half of drivers said they had spent more than three hours stuck in traffic. Drivers in Beijing and Shenzhen expressed the most anger, and New Delhi drivers were most likely to give up and head home rather than fight traffic.
Overall, 60 percent of city-dwellers used a car or motorcycle to commute an average of 21km in 33 minutes - traveling at 37km/h. About 13 percent commuted by bus and seven percent by train.
Stop-start traffic was the biggest complaint of drivers, followed by unreliable journey time, the slow pace, and rude or aggressive drivers. One in 10 had no complaints.
More than half of drivers in Mexico City, Milan, Bangalore, and Johannesburg reported getting stressed-out. A significant number of drivers in Chinese and Indian cities said they suffered respiratory problems while stuck in traffic.
Even so, fuel prices would have to rise 40 percent to persuade even one in five drivers to opt for a different mode of transport.
Drivers ranked Mexico City worst, followed by Shenzhen, Beijing, Nairobi, Johannesburg, Bangalore, New Delhi, Moscow, Milan, Singapore, Buenos Aires, Los Angeles, Paris, Madrid, New York, Toronto, Stockholm, Chicago, London, and Montreal.
When asked what they would do with the additional time if traffic eased, half of New York drivers said they would exercise. More than one in four drivers in Milan, Bangalore, New Delhi, Beijing, and Nairobi said they would work more. - Reuters
A few days ago IOL published an article that said that JHB had the worst traffic in the world. IOL please make up your mind!
Showing items 1 - 1 of 1