‘Scientists find missing ancestral link in Sediba’

Comment on this story


iol scitech june 7 homo erectus pic

REUTERS

A preserved skull of Homo erectus, dated to about 1.55 million years ago. Scientists at Wits university have revealed new evidence that suggests that Australopithecus sediba might have been a direct ancestor of Home erectus.

Scientists at Wits university have revealed new evidence that suggests that Australopithecus sediba might have been our direct ancestor.

This evidence, that is been presented at the Origins Centre at Wits University, puts forward the idea that Sediba might clear up the problem of the “muddle in the middle” and may be a better ancestor for Homo erectus, the species from which Homo sapiens are believed to have evolved.

The Scientists argue this in five papers that have appeared in the latest journal of Science.

What the papers deal with are aspects of the two skeletons that were discovered at the Malapa site, three years ago.

One of the papers describes the most complete hand ever described in an early ancestor of man.

Also examined is an undistorted pelvis, the most accurate brain scan of an early hominin and pieces of the foot and ankle.

The scientists were also able to obtain a date for the two skeletons, of 1,977 million years, one of the most accurate ever achieved. A margin of error of just 3000 years over close to two million years.

What the team explain in the papers is that the sediba showed a combination of features that are both primitive and advanced and never seen before in a hominin.

“The fossils demonstrate a surprisingly advanced but small brain, a very evolved hand with a long thumb like a humans, a very modern pelvis, but a foot and ankle shape never seen in any hominin species that combines features of both apes and humans in one anatomical package,” explained Professor Lee Berger of the Institute of Human Evolution at Wits University.

He suggests that the advanced features make sediba the best candidate ancestor for our genus that of Homo.

It was only last year that Berger and other team members announced the discovery of two skeletons, an adult female and child. At the time the two were the best preserved early hominin skeletons ever to be found.

The site has since produced well over 220 bones and scientists believe there are five other hominins, including the remains of babies, juveniles and adults. - The Star

sign up

Share |  

Facebook icon

Facebook

Twitter icon

Twitter

Google icon

Google

Yahoo icon

Yahoo

Reddit icon

Reddit

del.icio.us icon

del.icio.us

Pinterest icon

Pinterest

Email

Print

  • Rate this article
  • Average reader rating (3 votes) 5 Stars

Comment Guidelines



  1. Please read our comment guidelines.
  2. Login and register, if you haven’ t already.
  3. Write your comment in the block below and click (Post As)

Justin.A, wrote

IOL Comments
12:56pm on 9 September 2011
IOL Comments

Having read only the first sentence and then stopping, i am amazed at how many scientists seem to be finding a link between us and some primate of the past, or neanderthal man, or half man half something else thats missing. this is all bollocks. we didnt come from apes because if we did why do we still have them Read a biology book, and don't stop at the first sentance.

Report this

IOL Comments

Creationist, wrote

IOL Comments
05:22pm on 8 September 2011
IOL Comments

Can a person discern the level of brain function from the shape of the cavity that housed it?

Report this

IOL Comments

Creationist, wrote

IOL Comments
05:19pm on 8 September 2011
IOL Comments

Mmmmmm. Most accurately dated? How do they claim that? Relative to what other objectively known age. Do diamonds not have heaps of Carbon 14 in them, are they not of the most dense of minerals and therefore cannot be contaminated internally after formation? Yet it is claimed that they are millions, more likely billions of years old. Is the fossil dated according to the strata it was recovered from?

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
05:16pm on 8 September 2011
IOL Comments

God created man not animals that evolved over time to become man!

Report this

IOL Comments

colinA, wrote

IOL Comments
05:15pm on 8 September 2011
IOL Comments

Having read only the first sentence and then stopping, i am amazed at how many scientists seem to be finding a link between us and some primate of the past, or neanderthal man, or half man half something else thats missing. this is all bollocks. we didnt come from apes because if we did why do we still have them

Report this

IOL Comments

eixsh, wrote

IOL Comments
04:40pm on 8 September 2011
IOL Comments

Don't know why they had to dig this one up, coz there are plenty of them still alive in government.

Report this

IOL Comments

Michael, wrote

IOL Comments
04:40pm on 8 September 2011
IOL Comments

When you look at a depiction of our ancestors slowly coming upright from our knuckle-dragging distant past to our modern day upright gait, people often wonder why homo-sapien suddenly stood upright. Well, I think it's pretty obvious - right behind us was naked Homo Erectus - that'll make you stand up straight pretty quickly.

Report this

IOL Comments

Showing items 1 - 7 of 7

Join us on

IOL-Social networks IOL-Social networks
IOL-Social networks

Mobile
on m.iol.co.za

IOL-Social networks

Newsletters
Subscribe

IOL-Social networks

RSS feeds
Subscribe