Turin Shroud made by ‘flash of light’

Comment on this story
iol scitech dec 21Turin Shroud AP The Holy Shroud, a 14 foot-long linen revered by some as the burial cloth of Jesus, is shown at the Cathedral of Turin.

London - The image on the Turin Shroud could not be the work of medieval forgers but was instead caused by a supernatural “flash of light”, according to scientists.

Italian scientists have found evidence that casts doubt on claims that the relic - said to be the burial cloth of Jesus - is a fake and they suggest that it could, after all, be authentic.

Sceptics have long argued that the shroud, a rectangular sheet measuring about 14ft by 3ft, is a forgery dating to medieval times.

Researchers from Italy’s National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development spent years trying to replicate the shroud’s markings.

They have concluded only something akin to ultraviolet lasers - far beyond the capability of medieval forgers - could have created them.

This has led to fresh suggestions that the imprint was indeed created by a huge burst of energy accompanying the Resurrection of Christ.

“The results show a short and intense burst of UV directional radiation can colour a linen cloth so as to reproduce many of the peculiar characteristics of the body image on the Shroud of Turin,” the scientists said.

The image of the bearded man on the shroud must therefore have been created by “some form electromagnetic energy (such as a flash of light at short wavelength)”, their report concludes. But it stops short of offering a non-scientific explanation. Professor Paolo Di Lazzaro, who led the study, said: “When one talks about a flash of light being able to colour a piece of linen in the same way as the shroud, discussion inevitably touches on things such as miracles.

“But as scientists, we were concerned only with verifiable scientific processes. We hope our results can open up a philosophical and theological debate.”

For centuries, people have argued about the authenticity of the shroud, which is kept in a climate-controlled case in Turin cathedral. One of the most controversial relics in the Christian world, it bears the faint image of a man whose body appears to have nail wounds to the wrists and feet.

Some believe it to be a physical link to Jesus of Nazareth. For others, however, it is nothing more than an elaborate forgery.

In 1988, radiocarbon tests on samples of the shroud at the University of Oxford, the University of Arizona, and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology dated the cloth to the Middle Ages, between 1260 and 1390.

Those tests have been disputed on the basis that they were contaminated by fibres from cloth used to repair the shroud when it was damaged by fire in the Middle Ages.

More recently, further doubt was cast on its authenticity when Israeli archaeologists uncovered the first known burial shroud in Jerusalem from the time of the Crucifixion.

Its weave and design are completely different from the Turin Shroud, they said. The Jerusalem shroud has a simple two-way weave Ð but the twill weave used on the Turin Shroud was introduced more than 1,000 years after Christ lived. - Daily Mail

Hungry for more scitech news? Sign up for our daily newsletter


sign up
 
 

Comment Guidelines



  1. Please read our comment guidelines.
  2. Login and register, if you haven’ t already.
  3. Write your comment in the block below and click (Post As)
  4. Has a comment offended you? Hover your mouse over the comment and wait until a small triangle appears on the right-hand side. Click triangle () and select "Flag as inappropriate". Our moderators will take action if need be.

     

Peter B, wrote

IOL Comments
04:47pm on 23 December 2011
IOL Comments

@ Meme-Man: Jesus tastes like fish paste ... you crack me up!

Report this

IOL Comments

Meme-Man, wrote

IOL Comments
09:42am on 23 December 2011
IOL Comments

Mrs. Petey - "I'll bet it (toast with jesus face) tastes same wither(sic) way": I once had jesus on my toast and it tasted like fishpaste - so I think it was really him. That's probably why people put the fish on their car, because they've had the same thing.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
01:08am on 23 December 2011
IOL Comments

Flash of light? Seems like someone has been dipping into the altar wine too much and suffering from a hangover. I know the feeling, it can blow your mind the next morning

Report this

IOL Comments

Mrs. Petey, wrote

IOL Comments
09:00pm on 22 December 2011
IOL Comments

I don't know if that's Jesus's image or not or even what difference it makes. If that's Jesus, cool, if not, oh well. It doesn't change what I believe or don't believe one little bit. A lot of people see Jesus on their toasted bread too, I've seen pictures, they are neat looking, but I have nothing more to say about them, I'll bet it tastes the same wither way. :P

Report this

IOL Comments

Peter B, wrote

IOL Comments
07:01pm on 22 December 2011
IOL Comments

If you guys believe so strongly, why do you give a damn about this piece of cloth? Give it a break already, there's a real world out there.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
03:31pm on 22 December 2011
IOL Comments

Load of garbage?...check. Dirty old face cloth?....check. People with nothing better to do than play with a towel...check.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
03:21pm on 22 December 2011
IOL Comments

People need to do their homework - The Lord Jesus Christ face was so marred during his crucifixion you couldn't even tell he had a face - "His visage was marred more than any man, And His form more than the sons of men" (Isa 52:13-14). Please do not waste your time on this obvious lie.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
02:40pm on 22 December 2011
IOL Comments

@Meme-Man Must be National Geographic's Darwin month that gave you all this wisdom....awesome dude. Surely your decoder must be on then. Hope they have Santa-Saurus on for you over Xmas time otherwise the religious mumbo jumbo must make you sick. New years resolution for me is to believe that the earth will be a couple of billion years older next year, another bone fragment be found and we can see it ate bambi, it will be warmer in Summer than in Winter and the russians might get to Mars. Actually all banter aside, I wish you all Season Greetings

Report this

IOL Comments

getyourfactsstrait, wrote

IOL Comments
02:23pm on 22 December 2011
IOL Comments

The burial cloth of the Shroud was a 3 over 1 herringbone twill weave, which was an expensive 1st century Syrian design as stated, "The weaving pattern, 3:1 twill, is consistent with first-century Syrian design, according to the appraisal of Gilbert Raes of the Ghent Institute of Textile Technology in Belgium." Something only a wealthy 1st century man would procure. And this is exactly how the four gospel accounts describe the man that buried Christ, Joseph of Arymithea. Someone who would have expensive burial linens. It's possible he gave his own linens for Christ to be buried. Concerning the linen, this article is not accurate.

Report this

IOL Comments

Meme-Man, wrote

IOL Comments
12:50pm on 22 December 2011
IOL Comments

Sorry Anonymous - perhaps it's not whacky-tabaccy and you're just talking in tongues... or my decoder is just not turned on - hang on, I'll go check.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
12:29pm on 22 December 2011
IOL Comments

@Meme-Man funny since I got you on your way out, after all those brandied christmas cake. Watch out you might evolve into intelligent design a creation of you own intellect. Happy Hollandaise made from primal soup

Report this

IOL Comments

Meme-Man, wrote

IOL Comments
11:58am on 22 December 2011
IOL Comments

Hey Anonymous; I see you've been at the Xmas trifle early this year. Remember - don't drink and drive. Merry Xmas.

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
10:31am on 22 December 2011
IOL Comments

@Meme-Man And believing that a millions of years of reality created on one piece of bone is not a religion. So the Israeli archeologist who is probably Jewish used what to know that the shroud he uncovered, is authentic or is this again a case of if I want to prove the popular science fad of the day I will go to extreme lengths to prove it and only those scientist that agrees are REAL scientist. Boe hoe hoe, dont cry for my you oozy space rockey you. But at least we will know for a fact that next year the earth would have aged by another billion years or so

Report this

IOL Comments

mark, wrote

IOL Comments
10:36am on 22 December 2011
IOL Comments

The carbon dating from 1978 has been disproven as it was taken from a patch used to repair the shroud. Scientists have proven the image is not a painting and could not come from body contact, but from a flash of UV radioactive light. Interesting.

Report this

IOL Comments

Meme-Man, wrote

IOL Comments
10:17am on 22 December 2011
IOL Comments

Sorry - but i'm rather astounded that creationists are trumpeting 'success' when 'scientists' apparently affirm what they believe. Last week the same creationists were saying that scientific evidence doesn't count - so I'm confused!? Now - what I'm reading here is not the language of science - and for that reason I don't buy that these are bona fide scientists but rather researchers working on behalf of the Templeton foundation. The report claims "supernatural bursts of light" - no scientist in his or her right mind would use that gibberish' that statement is the language of defeat. "Supernatural" means "beyond nature", and since science is the study of nature, they will either give a known phenomenon or say that they don't have the answer but are working on it. "Occams razor" applies - mountains of data say it's from medieval times, and one confusing statement to the contrary does not swing the argument.

Report this

IOL Comments

fred, wrote

IOL Comments
10:21am on 22 December 2011
IOL Comments

so If the cloth was 13th century , how do you explain how the image came to be on it?

Report this

IOL Comments

buhari, wrote

IOL Comments
06:03pm on 21 December 2011
IOL Comments

let keep it right

Report this

IOL Comments

Anonymous, wrote

IOL Comments
04:09pm on 21 December 2011
IOL Comments

My towel looked like that once when I wiped my dirt ridden face.

Report this

IOL Comments

Siener, wrote

IOL Comments
03:49pm on 21 December 2011
IOL Comments

Ugh...It's a fake. There is no doubt about it at all. Carbon 14 dating confirms that it's from the 14th century. The first historic mention of it dates from the same period and calls it a forgery. The "blood" is red tempera paint. The herringbone weave of the cloth was not in use in Palestine during the time that Jesus lived. There is nothing even slightly authentic about this cloth, but of course the church wants to keep the racket going. Since the C14 dating they've been very careful to only allow crackpot religiously motivated "scientists" anywhere near it.

Report this

IOL Comments

Cas, wrote

IOL Comments
03:40pm on 21 December 2011
IOL Comments

Everyone can believe what they like. It does not matter if the shroud is real or fake. I know my Saviour died for me on the cross and is now sitting next to God in heaven preparing a place for me when my spirit leave my earthly body.

Report this

IOL Comments

Showing items 1 - 20 of 33