Tekkie Town shares and assets have been frozen. File Photo: IOL

JOHANNESBURG – The former owners and management of Tekkie Town have won the interdict application to restrain Steinhoff and Pepkor from dealing with shares of the Tekkie Town company or with Tekkie Town stored.

This means that the shares and assets owned by Tekkie Town have been frozen and the company will not be able to trade meanwhile.

The former owners and management of Tekkie Town in April launched an urgent application in the Western Cape High Court against, among others, Steinhoff and its subsidiary Pepkor.

The former Tekkie Town team sought to interdict and restrain the respondents from dealing with the shares of the Tekkie Town company or with the Tekkie Town stores and business in any manner that would prevent Pepkor or Steinhoff NV from restoring the vendors to their shareholding and control of the Tekkie Town business, before these were disposed of to Steinhoff.

They also sought an interdict that would prevent Pepkor and its subsidiary Pepkor Speciality from alienating, transferring, ceding, assigning or otherwise encumbering the shares in Tekkie Town, or the business trading as Tekkie Town.

During 2016 Tekkie Town Founder Braam Van Huyssteen and others exchanged the entire shareholding in Tekkie Town for restricted shares in Steinhoff.  When Steinhoff collapsed following the revelations of what was initially termed “accounting irregularities”, Steinhoff’s share price imploded spectacularly and the script which the Tekkie Town vendors had received for their company and its business became commercially worthless.  These vendors were among the first to institute legal proceedings against Steinhoff, having launched a restitution action in the Western Cape High Court during May 2018 seeking return of their shareholding and with it the Tekkie Town business.

Following a lengthy forensic investigation by auditors PwC, Steinhoff revealed that a group of Steinhoff executives lead by Markus Jooste and other external co-conspirators were responsible for skewing Steinhoff’s actual financial position by a staggering R106-billion.  According to the announcement, these malfeasances date back as far as 2009. 

Steinhoff is yet to publish its 2017 audited financials or other restatements that should fully reflect the extent of what the company itself has labelled “non-compliance with laws and regulations and misappropriations”.

“It is clear to us that, following Steinhoff’s publication of the results of the PWC forensic investigation and the company’s own testimony to the Parliamentary committees in March, our case for restitution is sound.   By the company’s own admission, what was presented to us as Steinhoff’s financial position in 2015 and 2016 was a far cry from the truth and based on elaborate misrepresentations,” said Van Huyssteen.

“Steinhoff’s continuing sell-off of assets to raise cash and stave off liquidation is obviously of concern to us and we need to ensure that the outcome of our main action, which is to restore our shareholding and management control of Tekkie Town, will remain a feasible option for the Court to order.” he added.

Former Tekkie Town chief executive Bernard Mostert said, prior to launching the interdict application, those applying for the interdicts had approached both Steinhoff and Pepkor, requesting an irrevocable undertaking regarding Steinhoff’s control of Pepkor and Pepkor’s control of Tekkie Town.

“Recent revelations and actions by Steinhoff – including an increased velocity in selling assets – suggest to us that Steinhoff’s shareholding in Pepkor itself or the integrity of Pepkor’s controversial shareholding in Tekkie Town may be at risk, be it through attempts to sell the business or efforts to raise debt against the business and its assets,” said Mostert.