Did Hlophe try to influence Zuma decision?

Published May 30, 2008


Cape Judge President John Hlophe has been accused of attempting to influence the Constitutional Court's decision on search and seizure raids carried out by the Scorpions on properties of Jacob Zuma and French arms manufacturing giant Thint.

A Concourt statement released on Friday afternoon said that a complaint had been referred to the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) after allegations that "Judge John Hlophe, has approached some of the judges of the Constitutional Court in an improper attempt to influence this Court's pending judgment in one or more cases..."

The statement did not reveal which of the 11 Concourt judges had allegedly been approached by Hlophe, but it did say that "the complaint relates to the matters of Thint (Pty) Ltd v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others (CCT 89/07), JG Zuma and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others (CCT 91/07), Thint Holdings (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions (CCT 90/07) and JG Zuma v National Director of Public Prosecutions (CCT 92/07)."

The cases were heard by the Court in Johannesburg between March 11 and March 14 and related to controversial search and seizure raids at properties belonging to Zuma in Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal and at the Durban office of his attorney Michael Hulley on August 18, 2005.

A ruling has yet to be made.

Zuma, Hulley and Thint have argued that they should be granted leave to appeal against a November 8, 2006, majority judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal that upheld the raids.

The raids were carried out two months after judge Hilary Squires convicted Zuma's former confidante and financial adviser Schabir Shaik on two counts of corruption and one count of fraud in the Durban High Court.

The corruption charges related to Shaik's attempt to solicit a R500 000 a year bribe from French arms manufacturing giant Thales International (formerly Thomson CSF) for Zuma.

Hlophe could not be reached for comment and Sapa was told that he had left his office in Cape Town and would only be available again on Monday.

The Concourt statement said: "We stress that there is no suggestion that any of the litigants in the cases referred to ... was aware of or instigated this action."

It further said: "The judges of this Court view conduct of this nature in a very serious light."

National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson Tlali Tlali said he had not seen the statement and could not therefore comment.

Advocate Rudi van Rooyen, the chairman of the Cape Bar Council, said he could not immediately comment, but that a statement would be issued shortly.

He said the council was dealing with the matter, which it "considered as one of extreme emergency and extreme concern".

Hulley said he had not seen the statement and that "I find the whole thing a bit bizarre."

He said he would not be in a position to comment until the JSC had released its findings and "when we know what the full nature of the complaint is". - Sapa

Related Topics: