Water tariff hikes slammed

The Rietvlei Dam is overflowing due to heavy rains. Picture: Damaris Helwig

The Rietvlei Dam is overflowing due to heavy rains. Picture: Damaris Helwig

Published May 2, 2012

Share

The DA has asked that the Msunduzi municipality investigate the financial feasibility of raising a loan to cover its contribution towards the construction of the Spring Grove Dam near Mooi River.

According to the proposed yearly increase, residents would be paying 22 percent for water, up dramatically from the current 8 percent.

Of this increase, Msunduzi said, 11 percent would go towards the construction of the dam.

DA councillor Mergen Chetty said this increase was unacceptable.

“We agree to the 6.5 percent increase for inflation and the 4.5 percent for ageing infrastructure, but propose that our 11 percent contribution towards the Spring Grove Dam be reduced to 3 percent.

“This will result in a water tariff increase of 14 percent for the 2012/2013 financial year.

“We request that the municipality investigates the financial feasibility of raising a loan to cover its contribution towards the construction of the Spring Grove Dam.

“The 3 percent we propose must be factored into the water tariff for the period it will take to pay off the loan, meaning that, if the total loan repayment is being paid over a five-year period, the council will include this 3 percent annually for the next 5 years,” he said.

Regarding the 16 percent electricity increase, Chetty suggested that 20 percent of the revenue collected from the monthly ampere charge in the 2012/2013 budget be retained in a ring-fenced account and used specifically for electricity infrastructure maintenance and renewal.

“We believe that the electrical outages in Pietermaritzburg have resulted in serious financial losses,”he said.

“We will, as a city, struggle to attract new business and industrial investment, if there are serious concerns on our ability to deliver a reliable electricity supply,” he said.

On the refuse tariff increase of 5 percent, Chetty said the amount should be linked to the inflation rate, which was reported to be 6.15 percent in March.

This, he said, was because the waste department had been criticised by ratepayers for poor communication, lack of services and sporadic collections.

In view of these circumstances, he considered it unwise to impose a tariff increase that was below inflation as the department needed funding to improve its service. - The Mercury

Related Topics: