Missile tests showcase North Korea's growing capability

North Korean military conducts a "strike drill" for multiple launchers and tactical guided weapon into the East Sea during a military drill. File picture: KCNA via Reuters

North Korean military conducts a "strike drill" for multiple launchers and tactical guided weapon into the East Sea during a military drill. File picture: KCNA via Reuters

Published May 10, 2019

Share

Seoul - North Korea's second missile test

on Thursday signals it is serious about developing new,

short-range weapons that could be used early and effectively in

any war with South Korea and the United States, analysts

studying images of the latest launches say.

Last week, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un oversaw the first

flight of a previously untested weapon - a relatively small,

fast missile experts believe will be easier to hide, launch, and

manoeuvre in flight.

Photos released by state media on Friday showed Thursday's

test involved the same weapon.

The tests have increased tensions after the last US-North

Korea summit collapsed in February in Hanoi with no agreement

over Pyongyang's nuclear weapons and ballistic missile

programme.

South Korean President Moon Jae-in said late on Thursday

the launches seemed like a protest over the failed summit, while

North Korea has defended the tests as routine and self

defensive.

Some analysts say the multiple tests show the missiles

aren't only for political show.

"This second test solidifies that these launches are not

just to stir the pot and elicit a U.S. response to resume

negotiations," said Grace Liu, one of a team of missile experts

at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS) in

California. "They are developing a reliable, operable missile

that can defeat missile defences and conduct a precision strike

in South Korea."

DEFEATING MISSILE DEFENCES

The US and South Korean responses to the launches have

been muted, with U.S. President Donald Trump and other officials

emphasising the missiles are not the large, intercontinental

ballistic missiles (ICBMs) capable of reaching the United

States.

But analysts said the military applications of the new

missiles should not be underestimated.

"The Trump administration keeps downplaying these missiles

because they are not ICBMs, but even though they can’t reach the

U.S. mainland, it’s missiles like these that will start the

war," said Melissa Hanham, a weapons expert at Datayo, which

tracks international security threats.

"They are small, easy to hide, easy to manoeuvre and you

can’t tell what kind of warhead they are carrying. They could

carry a nuclear weapon."

In a preliminary report on Wednesday, the North Korea

tracking website 38 North said the new missile looks similar to

Russia's SS-26 Iskander missile, and could exploit gaps in South

Korean and American missile defence coverage.

The United States and South Korea field Patriot and THAAD

missile batteries designed to shoot down various ballistic and

cruise missiles, but their capabilities have been disputed.

While the origin of the North Korean missile remains

unclear, a team of analysts at CNS told Reuters that Thursday's

test confirmed the missile is capable of manoeuvring to elude

defences and protect its launch crew from detection.

"You can tell from the low apogee that this missile

manoeuvres a bit in boost to defeat missile defences and

aircraft hunting the launcher," said Jeffrey Lewis of CNS.

Michael Duitsman, a rocket propulsion expert with the team,

said North Korean state media photos of the launch show likely

thrust vanes and steerable fins that guide the missile with

precision and allow it to manoeuvre through much of its flight.

While Saturday's missile was fired from a transporter

erector launcher (TEL) vehicle with wheels, Thursday's test

featured a tracked vehicle.

Use of a tracked vehicle, which North Korea has more

experience building, suggests it may plan to deploy a large

number of the missiles and launchers, said Joshua Pollack,

editor of The Nonproliferation Review.

"This seems to be their only mass-production option for

highly capable TELs at the moment," he said.

The missile uses solid fuel, which allows the weapon to be

easily moved and fired more quickly than those using liquid

fuel, analysts said.

In the end, the new missiles add a new level of

unpredictability to an already tense situation, Hanham said.

"If North Korea pulls out (an ICBM) everyone knows it’ll be

launched with a nuke," she said. "These little missiles you

don’t know, so it’s hard to be prepared."

POLITICAL SHOCKWAVES

The new weapon's manoeuvrability and low flying has led some

South Korean officials to hesitate to label the weapon a

"ballistic missile," a weapon that would likely violate United

Nations Security Council resolutions.

"Given its low altitude, more careful analysis is required,"

said ruling party lawmaker Ahn Gyu-baek, citing military

officials. "One should also be careful to not aggravate the

situation with hasty actions."

Ahn said South Korean military officials had assessed a

number of potential political motives behind the missile

launches. Those included increasing pressure for sanctions

relief, and protesting Seoul's military buildup including the

purchase of new F-35 fighter aircraft as well as joint military

drills by the United States and South Korea, which North Korea

complained about in statements defending the tests.

The tests also likely held a message for domestic audiences

designed to boost support for Kim's government, he said.

"The Kim regime is determined to fight pressure with

pressure," said Leif-Eric Easley, a professor at Ewha University

in Seoul. "It is threatening to raise regional tensions and

create political problems for Moon and Trump if not offered

economic concessions it failed to win in Hanoi."

While Kim may not return to launching ICBMs or testing

nuclear weapons immediately, he may seek other provocative ways

to break the stalemate, Pollack said.

"Kim Jong Un has given the United States until the end of

the year to rethink its approach," he said. "But if they don’t

get a meaningful response to these tests, maybe they’ll try to

push the envelope further." 

Reuters

Related Topics: