The Taxation Laws Amendment Bill (TLAB), released on October 25, proposes measures intended to target certain share buy-back and dividend-stripping arrangements.
Exempt dividends that are “extraordinary dividends” received or accrued (i) 18 months prior to a disposal of shares; or (ii) in respect, by reason or in consequence of such disposal, could result in these dividends being treated as income or proceeds for capital gains tax (CGT) purposes. This would be the case if a shareholder company holds a “qualifying interest” in the company distributing these “extraordinary dividends”. These dividends would be treated as income if the shares were held as trading stock, and as proceeds, if held as capital assets.
For unlisted companies, a “qualifying interest” is at least 50% of the equity shares or voting rights in the company making the distribution, or 20% if no other shareholder holds a majority. For listed companies, any shareholder holding at least 10% of equity shares or voting rights would have a qualifying interest.
For preference shares with dividends expressed as a rate, an “extraordinary dividend” is any exempt dividend received or accrued which rate is more than 15%. For any other share, extraordinary dividends are exempt dividends that exceed 15% of the higher of the market value of the shares disposed of (i) at the beginning of the 18-month period; or (ii) on the date of disposal of the shares.
As is typical with anti-avoidance measures, these provisions come into effect on the date the draft TLAB was circulated (July 19), and will apply to any disposals on or after this date. However, to provide some relief, these provisions should not apply to agreements that had been signed by July 19, although not yet unconditional on this date.
The Webber Wentzel tax team made oral and written submissions to National Treasury on the issues with the wording of these provisions in the draft bill. Some of these submissions were taken into account, specifically in relation to limiting the application of the rules to excessive dividends as opposed to all dividends; the inclusion of a carve-out for preference shares with a rate of interest less than 15%; and changing the proposed effective date to exclude arrangements, the terms of which were finally agreed to by the parties on or before July 19. This indicates a level of flexibility in National Treasury, which is appreciated, and the value of the public participation process.
The comments on the use of the corporate rules to defer the impact of these provisions were, unfortunately, not accepted. A section 47 liquidation distribution could potentially result in CGT for the holding company.
The comments on distributions in specie (a dividend to shareholders in a form other than cash) were also not accepted, and this could result in double taxation on the same economic gain. There could be CGT for the company making the distribution when the distribution in specie is declared, and CGT again for the shareholder company if there is a disposal of shares and the distribution is treated as proceeds.
Joon Chong is a partner and Wesley Grimm is a candidate attorney at law firm Webber Wentzel.