Wayde van Niekerk has backed compatriot Caster Semenya in the 800m double Olympic champion’s appeal hearing to the Court of Arbitration for Sport against IAAF regulations that seek to reduce naturally-occurring testosterone in female athletes.
“Caster is super strong,” he said. “I see it as something that is her personal battle. I believe she will come out of it stronger.
“This situation has been carrying on for a while now, and the way she is handling it... she is fighting for women to have their rights and their stand-out day in sports, and I respect her for it.”
Meanwhile, South Africa’s Parliament threw its weight behind Semenya on Thursday.
MPs from across the political spectrum wore black golf T-shirts with messages of support, including “we say NO to stigmatisation of women in sport”, and “we oppose subtle hatred”.
“Others arrive and say they want to give her drugs in order that she can’t compete,” chair of parliament’s sport and recreation committee Beauty Dlulane told the chamber in Cape Town.
“We already have a huge drug problem among South African youth,” she added.
Opposition National Freedom Party lawmaker Nhlanhlakayise Khubisa said: “What is happening to Caster is the worst form of racism. (It’s the) practice of patriarchy and chauvinism.
“She is being crucified for being an excelling, resilient, unwavering and unmatched athlete – our creme de la creme.”
United Democratic Movement MP Nqabayomzi Kwankwa said a scientific excuse was being used to “dumb down” Semenya’s successes.
The opposition Inkatha Freedom Party called on African athletes to boycott any future IAAF events if the “unfair ruling” was allowed to stand.
Peace ✌ pic.twitter.com/ln8ET9kfYV— Caster Semenya (@caster800m) February 28, 2019
Semenya’s best 800m time of 1:54.25 puts her fourth on the list of all-time fastest competitors.
It is almost one second slower than the world record of 1:53.28, set in 1983 by Jarmila Kratochvilova, which is now widely discredited because of Soviet-era doping.
The IAAF regulations were due to have been instituted in November 2018, but have been put on ice pending the outcome of last week’s hearings.
The ruling is expected on March 26.