Fans can do without Sharks’ politics

JP Pietersen of the Sharks makes a break during the 2016 Super Rugby match between the Stormers and the Sharks at Newlands Stadium, Cape Town on 12 March 2016 ©Ryan Wilkisky/BackpagePix

JP Pietersen of the Sharks makes a break during the 2016 Super Rugby match between the Stormers and the Sharks at Newlands Stadium, Cape Town on 12 March 2016 ©Ryan Wilkisky/BackpagePix

Published Jun 18, 2016

Share

“All we care about is the game. Just make sure it happens on the field.”

That was the response from chairman of the Sharks Supporters’ Club, George Laas, last night, after yesterday’s very public slanging match between former Sharks chief executive Brian Van Zyl and current Sharks boss John Smit.

Read: Van Zyl lifts lid on Sharks’ woes

“We just want to make sure it happens on the field, and that rugby remains sustainable. The Sharks is such a wonderful brand - fans don’t need these internal politics. Supporters are still following Super Rugby, and it’s so nice to see home-grown players such as the Du Preez brothers coming into the game.

“We need to look at the bigger picture. There is some great up-and-coming talent in the Sharks.”

The heated exchange started yesterday morning, when Van Zyl let rip with a torrent of accusations against Smit, KwaZulu-Natal Rugby Union president Graham Mackenzie and the Sharks board in an open letter to The Independent on Saturday’s sister newspaper, The Mercury, saying they had plunged the financially sound franchise into a situation “approximating insolvency”.

Van Zyl said that in his last executive year, up until December 2012, “The Sharks posted a profit of R14-million before dividends were paid”. These figures were corroborated by audit reports.

But during 2013 and 2014 the franchise suffered “an accumulated deficit of more than R40-million, and he suspected “a loss of another R20-million has been incurred since”, asking why the financials had not been approved for last year.

He was looking forward to the publication of the financials this year. Describing Smit as “naive in business, with no administrative record”, Van Zyl also questioned the appointment of Smith to the position of chief executive, saying the correct appointment process was not followed, and that he had been told it had been an “oversight” that he had neither been advised of nor involved in the decision.

With regard to the recent proposed move to Moses Mabhida Stadium, Van Zyl said that during his time as chief executive such a move was considered not to be financially viable.

But in a stinging response later yesterday, The Sharks and KZNRU president Graham Mackenzie slammed Van Zyl’s open letter as a “personal vendetta”, calling his accusations “a bitter and unjustified attack on John Smit”.

Saying Smit had substantially increased revenue for the Durban franchise in his three years at the helm, while “bravely clearing the spider’s web that he inherited”, Mackenzie denied the Sharks were in murky financial waters.

Smit has recently resigned from his position as chief executive and will leave at the end of this year’s rugby season.

Send your opinion: [email protected]. - Independent on Saturday

Related Topics: