Former Eskom CFO grilled on sponsor of Dubai trip

Former Eskom CFO Anoj Singh Photo: Henk Kruger/African News Agency/ANA

Former Eskom CFO Anoj Singh Photo: Henk Kruger/African News Agency/ANA

Published Jan 23, 2018

Share

Former Eskom chief financial officer Anoj Singh was accused of lying about who paid for his travels to Dubai as he testified before the parliamentary inquiry into the power utility on Tuesday.

Singh, who resigned on the eve of his appearance, was questioned by advocate Ntuthuzelo Vanara for less than an hour when the evidence leader confronted him with proof that a flight to Dubai in 2017 and a hotel stay years earlier were both funded by Sahara Computers, which belongs to the Gupta brothers, who are at the centre of an alleged web of state capture.

Singh had insisted that "the Gupta family did not pay for any of my travels". Instead, he said, the cost was covered by a mutual acquaintance, one Mr Alburushi, who invited him to the United Arab Emirates.

After confronting Singh with the paid invoice, retrieved from the leaked Gupta emails, Vanara asked whether Alburushi, who dealt in property, had any link with Sahara Computers.

Singh conceded: "Not that I know."

He said he had no personal relationship with the Gupta family, though he had met the brothers and may have crossed paths with them when they stayed at the same hotel in Dubai.

Vanara then turned to the negotiating of a coal contract with the Gupta family's Tegeta Exploration and how it came about that a penalty imposed on the Optimum coal mine it had acquired was slashed.

He confronted Singh with a note from former Oakbay board member Mark Parmensky demanding that the R2.1 billion penalty imposed by the utility on Glencore, the previous owner of the mine, be made to "go away".

Singh said he had left the arbitration process that saw the fine reduced to less than half-a-billion rand in the hands of former Eskom head of legal Suzanne Daniels, but had signed off on it because she was not comfortable doing both.

"Ms Daniels was responsible for negotiations at the time. Ms Daniels believed that given the fact that she was negotiating the contract, it would not be appropriate for her to sign it."

The inquiry was sparked in part by former public protector Thuli Madonsela's 2015 report in which she found that Eskom appeared to have gone out of its way to ensure that Tegeta obtained the Optimum mine and a lucrative coal supply contract.

MPs have in recent months heard how Eskom, in a hastily convened late-night meeting, approved a prepayment of more than R600 million to Tegeta that helped it to buy the Optimum mine.

Singh notoriously also helped Tegeta secure a bank guarantee from Absa with a view to the acquisition, but it was never utilised. 

African News Agency (ANA)

Related Topics: