NPA slated for persistent refusal to treat Zuma 'like any other accused'

National Director of Public Prosecutions Shaun Abrahams File photo: INLSA

National Director of Public Prosecutions Shaun Abrahams File photo: INLSA

Published Dec 11, 2017

Share

The DA has expressed its disappointment that National Director of Public Prosecutions Shaun Abrahams – who is fighting to keep his job – "still refuses to treat President Jacob Zuma like any other accused".

 

"In the normal course of justice, the accused would be charged before a court of law and only then given the opportunity to make representations. 

"However, Mr Zuma continues to receive special treatment and is yet to be charged like any other citizen," James Selfe MP, the DA Federal Council chairperson, said in a statement.

All shall be equal before the law but others shall be more equal than others! #Abrahams has been asked to vacate his position by the High Court. The #SCA decided that JZ should be charged. We have arrived in a kleptocracy! It’s Banana all the way @News24 https://t.co/GzbsYXneCH

— Zwelinzima Vavi (@Zwelinzima1) December 11, 2017

"The DA is disappointed but not at all surprised by yet more delaying tactics in the case against President Jacob Zuma on 783 counts of fraud, corruption, money-laundering and racketeering against him.

"In the first place, one wonders whether Shaun Abrahams is in a position to grant Mr Zuma an extension until 31 January, 2018 to submit representations as to why he should not be charged, given the decision last week by the high court in Pretoria that Abrahams must vacate his position as national director of public prosecutions (which Abrahams is appealing).

"Assuming he is in a position to do so, these charges are the very same ones put to Mr Zuma in 2007. This case is not complex and the only thing that has changed is the effluxion of time, which is very much a matter of Zuma’s own making.

"Finally, as we have pointed out exhaustively in our submissions to numerous courts throughout the eight and a half years we have fought to bring Mr Zuma to justice, it is not for the prosecutors, however diligent, to decide if Mr Zuma has a case to answer. 

"This decision must be made by a trial court, and the trial court must decide whether any evidence is inadmissible.

"The long history of delaying tactics and obfuscation continue, but the DA remains committed to ensuring Mr Zuma has his day in court."

Abrahams had initially given Zuma and his legal team until November 30 to make submissions.

In letter written to Zuma and his lawyers, Abrahams approved the extension based on a request from Zuma's legal team. 

They initially asked him for an extension until February 19 due to "non-availability due to prior legal commitment" and the complexity of the matter since eight years had passed since Zuma made representations to the NPA.

Related Topics: